Product Designer
The Team
Product Designer
1 PM & Founder
3 developers
Key Contributions
Feedback Analysis
Competitive Analysis
Ideation
Design
About Mathlabs
Based on continuous user feedback and customer interviews, we identified two distinct types of analysts using our platform:
Our goal was to ensure that both types of analysts could achieve deep domain understanding while maintaining comprehensive coverage throughout their exploration process
🏆 Domain Experts
Analysts who are well-versed in a domain, familiar with key players, sub-domains, and research strategies. They conduct top-down research and can assess when they have achieved sufficient coverage before diving deeper.
🤔 New-in-Domain Analysts
Analysts who are exploring a domain for the first time, are unaware of key players, sub-domains, or even what questions to ask. Their challenge is that they don’t know what they don’t know—leading to gaps in research and potential missed opportunities.
To improve the user experience of Mathlab’s AI research product, our team first set out to understand how the tool is applied. Analysts primarily utilize the Explore tool for their research, leveraging an AI chat interface, multiple sources, and a preview window of the portfolio list and other market overview features. This comprehensive suite of tools allows analysts to discover new companies, build lists, enhance insights, and gain a comprehensive understanding of a domain.
To help analysts ask the right questions and motivate them to continue exploration, we provided queries that were identified by the product's AI and guided them in continuing their domain exploration. While it helped some analysts, this solution still had limitations:
1
Repetitive suggestions
that failed to provide comprehensive market coverage
2
Lack of focused queries
making it difficult for analysts to refine their research.
3
Challenges in tracking progress
resulting in a lack of control over domain exploration.
Conclusion
To refine our understanding of the problem, we framed three key questions:
"How might we improve new-in-domain analysts' coverage within the Explore feature?"
"How might we enhance the depth and thoroughness of domain research?"
"How might we provide analysts with a greater sense of control over the process?"
We ultimately defined the problem as follows:
Exploring Solutions
User Flow
Competitive Analysis and Inspiration
Tree structure
Mini map
Floting actions bar
Prompt inside bubble
Prompt to generate map
1
Hierarchical topic expansion
breaking down subjects into clear sub-subjects.
2
Intuitive navigation allowing analysts to see relationships between topics.
3
Quick discovery of new sub-topics
using AI suggestions instead of manual queries.
Iterating on the Design
1
Analysts wanted brief descriptions for each sub-domain
(sub-topic) to understand their relevance.
2
Navigation felt cumbersome
requiring excessive scrolling and dragging within the mind map.